ࡱ> ny YK/s2q m4mPNG  IHDRAfPLTEzr<1%YPBH\tRNSރYbKGDa cmPPJCmp0712OmIDATX˗Hn܊)R5/mTIUVssz)JX_%!ߐo!V]UQ`BQ?ʲYd~ѤjP-˱p-m?b7QheԩA-ߕ@Hu}ͨeDu] C }DM@ @&zw S~vV۶xG-/w|@W^:e!b¥-7 @:CN 2 \Yth8T~XM?^]Vy3HG.^7;!F^y.d ߬ŭlWX?H@'JbgV~I/3K4f_B|p[{4JX$rdݮ50NSË.i'fY΢~%PL3aB#/Bj2+J|'l,1cnjK7$ԻesKaԬMmz;q U09Q^(S/fj@*>!=3>3m⤎m*1U1 f;?4^e+fsLٚZc^<vlm7  {{goxˆɴK主ǂaj;W*WYE^Iȯ+jT'Qv$o嬭A@iP%R򍐕9ҋ_EY>E~I =Nx}P6%$j`J>}ZO! 0>{=60Z UX$\Q3" އv' &v4U;#R"u-SwA`j"a ,!,ܜ=D^\O闐Eʯ!F@eh5;2޶Ą¯0L2*C~= P\h_DDx`"忄<쳰3DRbXN낙Ҫ +1|@Iۿ`&?zduI۷ra'Mw8o{u+z 1|ںU{:9Y-ExDfUء{Ի@ܓP˟ YPGemq:ss괺bͶUpkċ'7LkK wP3Y9 1q=K2B~MD-<􋲪 V-k O*ANӎ nxe%'L(^(3DIpBUGN|RW~>6+(ĉoJ+^<\SKVUƠúÑ}\8MLOˬF--S1HXVIIR*~bL tԍUYQԈ9Kܣ/XY☛8vyvT5g$gޟToo7 @u@T+IENDB`c( -./ 0DAriallacD(0(z[ 0 "DTimes New Roman(0(z[ 0  DWingdingsRoman(0(z[ 0 0DArial Blackman(0(z[ 0 "@DTahomalackman(0(z[ 0 "PDcmsy10lackman(0(z[ 0 "`DSymbollackman(0(z[ 0 @ .  @n?" dd@  @@``_FL2Ldrumroll.wav.WAV 10110KRIFFKWAVEfmt ++dataK||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||ggg`N9@DGK`kdn`gryy||unrdYRNNGKGGGNGGGNUYYkuyyuungkdYG@@@GNRRUR\dgy|nn`rNK@KRGDKGYDR\dgk||||r`y`YdKGD9KK``nnyyu||YUgrukYYRKNUGY`kgkdryggUUu`\RnU`\uu\y|u|y||ugrr|`\uggurunuuykrunuy|y||nnnrgrdrUYdr|r|ykyyy||||ykkuunn|kuugynrnr|||uu|yukukr|u||nd|r|y||yyr||||ynn|||uu|ygdgdRDYRY`ud\Rgy|ryyynykr|gr\RUnRUkdUR\YgY`un|rnddn`\RKKYR\NYYkyyyy||gUkgKUK?@ABCD ` fff33` 3KI3ff` 33ff` /p` 3%*3|` Jy3fff3f` 3ff3̙` 33ff33` DDyq3f` ̙3n` w3ff` }ff>?" dd@,?nKd@ P nA@F`d n?" dd@   @@``PR"   @ ` `2p>>   + * (    6X #" ``   `*   T  6x #" `` `` H@___PPT9"@ r*&     &F X #"X  Td#" `P H"0 C   <¬d#" `U H"0 C   c $\Ƭ"UY B D   s *ʬ"YW B D    s *̬"YU B D    s *xЬ" B D    c $Ӭ#" `SV H"0 C    c $8׬"Y B D    s *ڬ"X B D   <ݬ #" `  `  T Click to edit Master title style! !$  0߬ " `p  RClick to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level!     SN  6 #" `^ `` H@___PPT9"@ l*$    H  0޽h ? }ff80___PPT10. 07  Pixely   0 e(   F  "  Zrd #"   H"0 C   s *v "9)e  H"0 C b e  # "e   c $Xz"ie  H"0 C   c $}"9) H"0 C    c $"0 H"0 C    c $"?e  H"0 C    c $h") H"0 C    c $"?G H"0 C    c $"oG H"0 C   c $p"9G H"0 C   c $Ȕ"iA H"0 C   c $ "A? H"0 C N  6  #" `` `` H@___PPT9"@ l*$      6p #" ``   `*   T  6 #" `` `` H@___PPT9"@ r*&       0 "P    T Click to edit Master title style! !  0 " P   W#Click to edit Master subtitle style$ $H  0޽h ? }ff80___PPT10. 07 0 rj0(    0`      ^*  8  0 Q ` H@___PPT9"@ p*"    d  c $ ?    0  0  RClick to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level!     S  6t _    ^*  >  6p _Q` H@___PPT9"@ p*"    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3 X @x(    0\      ^*  8  0 Q ` H@___PPT9"@ p*"      6 _    ^*  >  68 _Q` H@___PPT9"@ p*"    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3 0L(  Lr L S      r L S p `P   r L C JA2smalltree_text_bluetrans `NH L 0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i.t#+D=' = @B +     x (    H( "`P     0pP`   L=L(R) 2 NPX ( 2cccc  0,iP p [P"( 2c0   0hiPp [V"( 2c0   00 0 w2R(x)R( 2ggg    0x" @ x (x2L)\( 2gccc X   0@ `"   s *"`0 X   0     0, P,$ 0 l9 efficient S s.t. 8 efficient V* 8 x2 L S(V*,x) <P,V*>(x)G( 2cc g33g33gcccc gcgccccc g  g&4   0<` L ,$ 0 _Everything an efficient verifier can learn after a ZK interaction can be learned by applying an efficient algorithm (i.e., simulator) to the public input.( 2g gIg g33g332g   0D 0 ,$ 0 gZero-Knowledge: ( 2c H  0޽h ? }ff|___PPT10\.Ų+i|D' = @B D' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +Dh' =%(D' =%(D8' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D8' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D8' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* Db' =%(D ' =%(D6' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D6' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D6' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(+P+0+  ++0+  ++0+ ++0+ ++0+ ++0+ +     [ (    H] "`P     0^P`   L=L(R) 2 NPX ( 2cccc   0i P ,$ 0 &R9 efficient E s.t. 8 efficient P* 8 x Pr[ E(P*,x)2 R(X)] Pr[(x)=1]S( 2cc g33g33gcccc gcgcc ggggg&@    0+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* D8' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D8' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* ++0+  ++0+  ++0+ +-   D < P T(  Tr T S 0    T 0Dp MEverything an efficient verifier can learn after a ZK interaction can be learned by applying an efficient algorithm to the public input.( 2g gIg g33g33 g  T 0d    vPopular formal interpretation: ( 2c   T 0 )9    *efficient = probabilistic polynomial-timeJ+( 2 gg!c* M T 0 0 3efficient = probabilistic expected polynomial-time4( 2 g33gcgcc3   T 0L`0 l9 efficient S s.t. 8 efficient V* 8 x2 L S(V*,x) <P,V*>(x)G( 2cc g33g33gcccc gcgccccc g  g&4 RB  T s *D|` ` H T 0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i.[+D=' = @B +   5 - ` X (  Xx X c $    X 0H W  vPopular formal interpretation: ( 2c   X 0@  *efficient = probabilistic polynomial-timeJ+( 2 gg!c* M X 0yP 3efficient = probabilistic expected polynomial-time4( 2 g33gcgcc3  X 00  ~nIf an efficient prover can convince the honest verifier that x2L then there exists an efficient algorithm (knowledge extractor) to extract a witness for x from the prover s strategy.( 2g g/ggg g33g33Xg8   X 0PP0  &R9 efficient E s.t. 8 efficient P* 8 x Pr[ E(P*,x)2 R(X)] Pr[(x)=1]S( 2cc g33g33gcccc gcgcc ggggg&@ RB  X s *D|P P H X 0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i.[+D=' = @B + p#1]j(  \ 0O  .] #""^0O   \ < ?"` O  T ExpectedEfficient Problem w/def [Feige]B+  c!c8  @`H \ <2 ?"`  0 ExpectedEfficient GapB  cc @` \ <> ?"`\TL___PPT9.&@  No Constant-round prot*D ccc*   @` \ <@ ?"`0 rCons  c  @`. \ <Q ?"` O   9 constant-round protocols** @ ccc  @`+ \ <\ ?"`    9 constant-round protocols@ ccc  @` \ <K ?"`  % Strict=Efficient Computation No Gap & &c%  @` \ <`o ?"` 0 rPros  c  @` \ <x ?"` O  vExpected   c  @` \ <́ ?"`  tStrict  c  @` \ <h ?"` uStrict   c  @`* \ <p ?"`0 Efficient Verifier/ Prover6  gc  @` \ < ?"` O  vExpected   c  @` \ <X ?"`  vExpected   c  @` \ < ?"`  tStrict  c  @` }\ <  ?"`0 \TL___PPT9.&@ Efficient Simulator/ ExtractorZ  g33 cc c(    @` p\ < ?"` O  wDef 3$ g  @` n\ < ?"`  wDef 2$ g  @` l\ <h ?"` wDef 1$ g  @` j\ < ?"`0 Xc  @``B .\ 0o ?00ZB 0\ s *1 ?ZB 1\ s *1 ?  `B 2\ 0o ?O O `B 3\ 0o ?0O `B 6\ 0o ?0O `B k\ 0o ?0O ZB \ s *1 ?0O ZB \ s *1 ?0O `B /\ 0o ?`B \ 0o ? 0 O  @\ 03P  Possible Defs for Zero-Knowledge !( 2!c &  ` 1] s *"`p H \ 0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i. pQ+D=' = @B +4  ((|(  | 0O  |# #""^0O   | < ?"` O  T ExpectedEfficient Problem w/def [Feige]B+  c!c8  @`H | < ?"`  0 ExpectedEfficient GapB  cc @` | < ?"`\TL___PPT9.&@  No constant-round prot*D ccc*   @` | <0  ?"`0 rCons  c  @`C | <, ?"` O  ! 9 constant-round prot** No gap@" cc c&   @`+ | <x7 ?"`    9 constant-round protocols@ ccc  @`  | <TA ?"`  % Strict=Efficient Computation No gap & &c%  @`  | <J ?"` 0 rPros  c  @`  | <S ?"` O  vExpected   c  @`  | <\ ?"`  tStrict  c  @`  | <f ?"` uStrict   c  @`* | <h ?"`0 Efficient Verifier/ Prover6  gc  @` | <z ?"` O  vExpected   c  @` | <x ?"`  vExpected   c  @` | < ?"`  tStrict  c  @` | <ȏ ?"`0 \TL___PPT9.&@ Efficient Simulator/ ExtractorZ  g33 cc c(    @` | <x ?"` O  wDef 3$ g  @` | <@ ?"`  wDef 2$ g  @` | < ?"` wDef 1$ g  @` | <Ķ ?"`0 Xc  @``B | 0o ?00ZB | s *1 ?ZB | s *1 ?  `B | 0o ?O O `B | 0o ?0O `B | 0o ?0O `B | 0o ?0O ZB | s *1 ?0O ZB | s *1 ?0O `B  | 0o ?`B !| 0o ? 0 O  "| 0@3P &Possible Defs for Zero-Knowledge / POK '( 2'c &  ` #| s *"`N ` $| s *"`V` %| s *"` 4 ` &| s *"` < ` '| s *"`  ` (| s *"` H | 0޽h ? }ff___PPT10. pQ+Dl' = @B D'' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D ' =%(D' =%(DY' =4@BB BB%()))D' =-g6B fade*<3<*#|D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*#|%(D ' =%(D' =%(DY' =4@BB BB%()))D' =-g6B fade*<3<*$|D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*$|%(D ' =%(D' =%(DY' =4@BB BB%()))D' =-g6B fade*<3<*'|D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*'|%(D ' =%(D' =%(DY' =4@BB BB%()))D' =-g6B fade*<3<*(|D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*(|%(D ' =%(D' =%(DY' =4@BB BB%()))D' =-g6B fade*<3<*%|D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%|%(D ' =%(D' =%(DY' =4@BB BB%()))D' =-g6B fade*<3<*&|D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*&|%(+- #)Q(   0O  # #""^0O    < ?"` O  T ExpectedEfficient Problem w/def [Feige]B+  c!c8  @`H  < ?"`  0 ExpectedEfficient GapB  cc @`  <l ?"`\TL___PPT9.&@  No constant-round prot*D ccc*   @`  < ?"`0 rCons  c  @`C  <` ?"` O  ! 9 constant-round prot** No gap@" cc c&   @`+  < ?"`    9 constant-round protocols@ ccc  @`   < ?"`  % Strict=Efficient Computation No gap & &c%  @`   <- ?"` 0 rPros  c  @`   <l/ ?"` O  vExpected   c  @`   <? ?"`  tStrict  c  @`   <hI ?"` uStrict   c  @`*  < K ?"`0 Efficient Verifier/ Prover6  gc  @`  <(] ?"` O  vExpected   c  @`  <Tf ?"`  vExpected   c  @`  <o ?"`  tStrict  c  @`  <q ?"`0 \TL___PPT9.&@ Efficient Simulator/ ExtractorZ  g33 cc c(    @`  <P} ?"` O  wDef 3$ g  @`  <T ?"`  wDef 2$ g  @`  <~ ?"` wDef 1$ g  @`  < ?"`0 Xc  @``B  0o ?00ZB  s *1 ?ZB  s *1 ?  `B  0o ?O O `B  0o ?0O `B  0o ?0O `B  0o ?0O ZB  s *1 ?0O ZB  s *1 ?0O `B   0o ?`B ! 0o ? 0 O  " 03P  Possible Defs for Zero-Knowledge !( 2!c &  , ) 0<0 (Summary: Def 1 is best if it can be met.l)( 2gcgcc( H  0޽h ? }ff___PPT10x. pQ+D ' = @B D_ ' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D ' =%(D> ' =%(D0' =4@BBBB%(D' =0l9 HBHBBB*<3<*D' =4@BBBB%()?)?DF' =.7 BBBBBGM 0.0 1.85185E-6 L -0.35 -0.33334 *3>*B ppt_xB ppt_y=0BBAA<*D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =A@BBBB0B%()?)?DN' =.7 BBBBBOM 0.00416 -0.04445 L 0.27916 -0.54445 *3>*B ppt_xB ppt_y=0BBAA<*)D6' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*)D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*)%(D6' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*"D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*"%(++0+" ++0+) ++0+) +@  -=(  ,   @ , #"";J   @<$@ 0    < ?"`  @ vExpected   c  @`   < ?"`   tStrict  c  @`   <  ?"`  uStrict   c  @`*  < ?"`  Efficient Verifier/ Prover6  gc  @`  < ?"`   @ vExpected   c  @`  <T ?"`   vExpected   c  @`  < ?"`   tStrict  c  @`  < ?"`  \TL___PPT9.&@ Efficient Simulator/ ExtractorZ  g33 cc c(    @`  < ?"`  @ wDef 3$ g  @`  <  ?"`   wDef 2$ g  @`  <t* ?"`  wDef 1$ g  @`  <|, ?"`  Xc  @``B  0o ?  ZB  s *1 ?  ZB  s *1 ?   `B  0o ? @ @`B  0o ?  @`B  0o ?  @`B  0o ?@ZB  s *1 ?  @`B   0o ?  a # 06 ,$ 0 )Summary: Def 1 is best if it can be met.l*( 2gcgcc)  ) 0> ,$ 0 3q[B,BG]: For Zero-Knowledge Def 1 can be met by a constant-round prot. w/ a non-black-box simulator (assuming CRH)xr( 2!cc'c g cc&@-  * 0 \ `,$ 0 ]Our Results: 1. In both cases Def 1 can not be met in constant-rounds by a black-box simulator/extractor. 2. In case of POK Def 1 can be met by a constant-round prot. w/ a non-black-box extractor (assuming CRH&TDP)&( 2 gcgcg c g)cgcg'c g cc&1 8X - 6Ԕ"``0,$D 0H  0޽h ? }ff''___PPT10'. pQ+%]D&' = @B D%' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D;' =%(%(D' =%(D+' =4@BB BB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*,%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*,D8' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*#%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*#D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*)%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*)D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<** %(D' =-g6B fade*<3<** D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<** k%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<** kD' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<**k%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<**kD#' =%(D ' =%(D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*,D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*,%(D6' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*#D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*#%(D6' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*)D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*)%(D<' =A@BB@BB0B%()?)?D' =.K7 BBBBB]M -1.66667E-6 -7.40741E-7 L 0.00313 -0.54491 *3>*B ppt_xB ppt_y=@0BBAApBB:B <** D<' =A@BB@BB0B%()?)?D' =.K7 BBBBB]M 5.55556E-7 -2.22222E-6 L -0.00174 -0.52916 *3>*B ppt_xB ppt_y=@0BBAApBB9cBww<** kD>' =A@BB@BB0B%()?)?D' =.M7 BBBBB_M -3.05556E-6 -4.07407E-6 L -0.00607 -0.47338 *3>*B ppt_xB ppt_y=@0BBAApBBLB(}r<**kD' =%(D' =%(Dg' =4@BB7BB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*-%(D' =+4 8?fCB#ppt_w*0.70BCB#ppt_wB*Y3>B ppt_w<*-D' =+4 8?\CB#ppt_hBCB#ppt_hB*Y3>B ppt_h<*-D' =-g6B fade*<3<*-+P+0+# ++0+# ++0+) ++0+) ++0+* ++0+* +    ) ! d (  dr d S 4x `    m d 0y t WMotivation: Look at how known expected poly-time black-box simulators work (e.g. [FS])~X( 2 ccg c gcW   d 0 [P"( 2c0   d 0l [V"( 2c0 z8 P  dP h"  d s *"`P  d 0 - '  ZV1 ( 2c r8 PP `  d P `  d 0PP `  d 0t  ZP1 ( 2c F P  d 0  h" d s *"`P  d 0 - '  ZV2 ( 2c F PP `  d @P P` d 0PP `  d 0$  ZP2 ( 2c H d 0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i.)v +D=' = @B +^=   0%(    0̧@G [S"( 2c0   0$@G \V*"( 2c0 z P   P ,$D 0h"  s *"`P   0į - '  ZV1 ( 2c z PP `      ,$D  0`   0PP `    0D  ZP1 ( 2c z P     ` ,$D 0h"   s *"`P   0ĸ - '  ZV2 ( 2c z PP `    P ,$D   0`  0PP `   0D  ^P2  ( 2c   0`@ ,$  0 ZV2 ( 2c z P    ` ,$D  0h"  s *"`P   0 - '  ^V2  ( 2c z PP `     ,$D   0`  0PP `   0  ^P1  ( 2c   03P,$ 0 XSuppose that V* only sends message v2 w.p. e|-( 2 cc ccc& " 0 P ,$  0 \Using (v1,v2) and (v1,v2 ) can simulate proof!x/( 2cccccl `P %`P,$D 0 # <GYHj "``P :  $ 0, oNo clue how to continue ( 2c H  0޽h ?# }ff))___PPT10).)v +D(' = @B D(' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D7' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-s6Bwipe(left)*<3<* D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<* D' =%(D' =%(Dg' =4@BB7BB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%%(D' =+4 8?fCB#ppt_w*0.70BCB#ppt_wB*Y3>B ppt_w<*%D' =+4 8?\CB#ppt_hBCB#ppt_hB*Y3>B ppt_h<*%D' =-g6B fade*<3<*%D' =%(D' =%(D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*%D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%%(D' =%(D' =%(D@' =A@BBBB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-o6Bwipe(up)*<3<*D ' =%(D' =%(D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =%(D' =%(D7' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-s6Bwipe(left)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*"%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*"D' =%(D' =%(D7' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-s6Bwipe(left)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*++0+ ++0+ ++0+" +     P n (    0@G [S"( 2c0   0D@G \V*"( 2c0 z P   P ,$D 0h"  s *"`P   0l - '  ZV1 ( 2c z PP `     ,$D  0`  0PP `    0d   ZP1 ( 2c z P     ` ,$D 0h"   s *"`P    0  - M  C?&( 2g  0 P  ,$ 0 &6w.p. 1-e: Output (v1,p1,?) ( 2cc r  0P3P XSuppose that V* only sends message v2 w.p. e|-( 2 cc ccc&F   0! p ,$ 0  - n2 work  ( 2ggogH  0޽h ? }ff___PPT10.)v +D' = @B D' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D7' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-s6Bwipe(left)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<* D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* +p+0+ ++0+  +S   `#4F(  r   05 P XSuppose that V* only sends message v2 w.p. e|-( 2 cc ccc&  00> Pp  &6w.p. 1-e: Output (v1,p1,?) ( 2cc   04H p   - n2 work  ( 2ggog  0P@G [S"( 2c0   0S@G \V*"( 2c0 z P   P ,$D 0h"  s *"`P   0|D4' = @B D4' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D7' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-s6Bwipe(left)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D@' =A@BBBB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-o6Bwipe(up)*<3<*D ' =%(D' =%(D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =%(D' =%(D7' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*"%(D' =-s6Bwipe(left)*<3<*"D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%%(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<*%D ' =%(D' =%(D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*%D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%%(D)' =4@BB BB%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*"D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*"%(D' =%(D' =%(D8' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*4%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*4D' =%(D' =%(D6' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*4D' =1:Bhidden*o3>+B#style.visibility<*4%(D' =%(D' =%(D7' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*(%(D' =-s6Bwipe(left)*<3<*(D' =%(D' =%(D9' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-u6Bwipe(right)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D7' =4@BBBB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-s6Bwipe(left)*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*1%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*1D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*2%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*2D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*3%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*3+P+0+ ++0+1 ++0+2 ++0+3 ++0+4 ++0+4 +T'   c [ p++(  r  0 P XSuppose that V* only sends message v2 w.p. e|-( 2 cc ccc&  00 Pp  &6w.p. 1-e: Output (v1,p1,?) ( 2cc   04 p   - n2 work  ( 2ggog  0@G [S"( 2c0   0@G \V*"( 2c0 F P   P h"  s *"`P    0 - '  ZV1 ( 2c F PP `      `   0PP `    0  ZP1 ( 2c F P     ` h"  s *"`P   0 - '  ZV2 ( 2c F PP `    P `  0PP `   0  d P2     ( 2c   0@  ZV2 ( 2c F PP `     `  0PP `   0`  ^P1  ( 2c qF P    ` h"  s *"`P   0 - M  C?&( 2gF PP `     `  0PP `   0T  `P1   ( 2c qF P    ` h"  s *"`P   0  - M  C?&( 2gF PP `      ` ! 0PP `  " 0   d P1     ( 2c F P  #  ` h" $ s *"`P  % 0t - '  d V2     ( 2c n & 0h P@ Xw.p. e: Output (v1,p1    ,v2    ,p2    ) -( 2c *n ' 0|   - (1/e)n2 work ( 2gggog ( 0*P BPEx[work] = (1-e)n2 + e(1/e)n2 O(n2) )( 2ggogggogggog"0l    +  ,$D 0 ) B9GH,t  "`   :  * 0T>   If we stop simulator after less than 1/e steps then simulation fails! Note that e may be any non-negligible value (e.g., 1/e >> n2 )B( 2%cg(c(cgggggock H  0޽h ?) }ff___PPT10q.)v +I*DE' = @B D' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D7' =%(%(D' =%(Dg' =4@BB7BB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*+%(D' =+4 8?fCB#ppt_w*0.70BCB#ppt_wB*Y3>B ppt_w<*+D' =+4 8?\CB#ppt_hBCB#ppt_hB*Y3>B ppt_h<*+D' =-g6B fade*<3<*++E  ia  (    0RP ` >JImpossibility of strict black-box simulation for constant-round protocols.K( 2c g c g g c g  c g J A  0`  _Let be ZK proof for L with c verifier messages and strict t(n)-time black-box simulator S8`( 2cccc cccccgccc g ccc&@   0mH ` ,$ 0 ,FLet V* be s.t. V* aborts in any round w.p. 1-e where e is chosen s.t. 8 x2 L 1. Pr[ <P,V*>(x)=1] = ec > 1/p(n) 2. Pr[ SV*(x) sees more than c messages ] << 1/p(n)d( 2cg cgcg   J _  8Xl       0,$D 0  0Dw    $(Choose e= ( c ) ( 2cgg6gggg6c0   00 lt(n)&( 2g    0ԅp  `-1&( 2g &l `   `,$D 0   BpGHm "``  : @  0  0   6 0 @ ( c )ec+1( 2ggg6gggg6o   6lJ $ lt(n)&( 2g H  0޽h ?  }ff | ___PPT10\ .a+8D ' = @B D ' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D' =%(D' =%(D8' =A@BB BB0B%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(Dg' =4@BB7BB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =+4 8?fCB#ppt_w*0.70BCB#ppt_wB*Y3>B ppt_w<*D' =+4 8?\CB#ppt_hBCB#ppt_hB*Y3>B ppt_h<*D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(D+' =4@BB BB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* +8+0+ +  j(    0 ^Our Results: 1. In both cases Def 1 can not be met in constant-rounds by a black-box simulator/extractor. 2. In case of POK Def 1 can be met by a constant-round prot. w/ a non-black-box extractor (assuming CRH&TDP)&( 2 gcgcg c g)cgcg'c g cc&1 8Xl  6Ԕ"`0H  0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i.E^+D=' = @B +b   y q   (    N|))?"`  0Y  -Obtaining POK with strict poly-time extractorZ.( 2c g g c -   0  mTrapdoor Permutations ( 2c   N|))?"` 6   0(@ v 2ZK membership proof* w/ strict simulation [B,BG]l3( 2c g cgc2    N|))?"`P   0  )constant-round Commit With Extract SchemeV*( 2cgcc   B?   Y= ( 2H   B@? @  Y+ ( 2H J  0C   FCommit-With-Extract: Secure commitment scheme s.t. using sender s code can extract committed value in strict polynomial-time. Can be used to obtain a ZKPOK for NPf( 2cRcc5cc.sH  0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i.H,+D=' = @B +$  ;3 (    0h CP@ c Conclusion: ( 2 c     08CP@P hvNon-Black-Box techniques are both necessary and sufficient to obtain strict polynomial-time simulation and extraction.w( 2"c ggc g cgg+cv H  0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i.e\+D=' = @B +  A 9  (     0 C  -Obtaining POK with strict poly-time extractorF.( 2c g c - \  0$C  *Proof Outline: Let L 2 NP, a ZKPOK will be+( 2cccccccc*   0\` [P"( 2c0   0@/C  [V"( 2c0 d  <GCHPP P   00C@@ `  u y=Comm(w)" ( 2 c&   0X8C  x2LF( 2ccc    0\=C w2W(x)F( 2ccc d   <GDH6   *   0BC   ZKP Comm-1(y) 2 W(x)l( 2ckccc& l  0P  0 P ,$D 0   BJCGaH; "` 0P  :    0HNC   Commit-With-Extract Need constant-round commitment scheme s.t. can extract committed value in strict poly-time using sender s code.( 2ccgcgcgcgc&:F H  0޽h ?  }ffyq___PPT10Q.H,+UD%' = @B D' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D' =%(D' =%(Dg' =4@BB7BB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =+4 8?fCB#ppt_w*0.70BCB#ppt_wB*Y3>B ppt_w<*D' =+4 8?\CB#ppt_hBCB#ppt_hB*Y3>B ppt_h<*D' =-g6B fade*<3<*+Y     (    0aCPPp 04Proof Sketch: Assume is c-round ZK proof for L5( 2 ccgcgccc cc4   0mCP,$ 0 1Suppose S is strict t(n)-time black-box simulator2( 2cgcccgcc& v  0,{C,$ 0 vLemma: If V* is honest+abort verifier and 8 x2 L Pr[ SV*(x) is accepting and S saw c responds ] > 1/p(n) Then L2BPP"w( 2ccgc ccggggcgog ggggggg gcggg& Z d  0vC `g ,$ 0 Why? For xLv ( 2ccgg    0C P ,$ 0 :Pr[ SV*(x) is accepting and S saw c responds ] = negl(n);( 2gog ggggggg g&3 H  0޽h ? }ff ___PPT10 .`Tه+(!CD ' = @B D ' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =%(D0' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*++0+C ++0+C ++0+C ++0+C +9   (  `  0DC`p,$ 0 (Fix V* s.t. in any round independently Z)( 2cg"c& f   0,C@`` ,$ 0 lThus 8 x2 L Pr [ SV*(x) is accepting proof for x] ec.7( 2cggg goggggg6   0XC`,$ 0 @FClearly, 8 x2 L Pr[ <P,V*>=1 ] = ec$( 2cggggo# l PP   0 `p ,$D 0   6CPP   *hBut Pr [ SV*(x) gets > c non-? responds ] ( c )ec+15( 2ccgoggggg gggg6gg6o4   6C   lt(n)&( 2g z  )   ),$D  0&  6,C ) xPr[ SV*(x) accepting and S saw c responds]ec-( c )ec+1 =( 2goggggggg gggg6gg6occ:#      6 ec = 1/p(n)'( 2cgg6gg6cgggo&   0@D, t(n) -1H ( 2go   s *"`0P,$D  0H  0޽h ? }ffH"@"___PPT10 ".`Tه+D ' = @B D ' = @BA?%,( < +O%,( < +D[ ' =%(D ' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D[' =4@BB BB%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*B%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*BD' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<* %(D' =-g6B fade*<3<* D ' =%(D' =%(D[' =4@BB BB%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*DK' =%(D' =%(Dh' =A@BB BB0B%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D+' =4@BB BB%(D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D ' =%(D' =%(D[' =4@BB BB%()))D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*D' =%(DZ' =%(D' =4@BB BB%(E' =' B`BPB<*%(//%,( < +D' =1:Bvisible*o3>+B#style.visibility<*%(D' =-g6B fade*<3<*++0+D ++0+ C ++0+D ++0+D ++0+D +   2 *   (    N|))?"`  0=D  -Obtaining POK with strict poly-time extractorZ.( 2c g g c -   0FD` _ cThm: Suppose that 1. 9 Trapdoor Permutations 2. 9 constant-round ZK argument for NP w/ strict poly-time simulator Then, 9 constant-round ZK argument of knowledge w/ strict poly-time knowledge-extractor.L( 2ccccc cccgccc gcggcc   0TD  mTrapdoor Permutations ( 2c   N|))?"` 6  0lXD@ v 2ZK membership proof* w/ strict simulation [B,BG]l3( 2c g cgc2   N|))?"`P0;   0_D\ -ZK proof* of knowledge w/ strict extraction .( 2 c gcgc gc   BLhD?   Y= ( 2H    BlD? @  Y+ ( 2H H  0޽h ? }ff___PPT10i.H,+D=' = @B +  0 P(  X  C      S   0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3S$  0 `(  X  C      S |Y 0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3S$  0 p(  X  C      S  0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3S$  0 (  X  C      S  ' 0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3S$  0 (  X  C      S T 0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3S$  0 (  X  C      S  0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3S$   0 (  X  C      S  0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3%   0 (  X  C      S  0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3%   0 (  X  C      S ,t 0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3%  0 (  X  C      S  0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3%   0 (  X  C      S  0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3%  0 (  X  C      S 0 0    H  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.3%  0 (  X  C      S @@TBhD|FHJLNPRU? WD Oh+'0U px   $ 0 <HP4Strict Polynomial-Time in Simulation and Extraction Boaz BaraknPixelar Boaz Barakn130Microsoft PowerPointe i@bEG`@@P##@iPGSg  )'    """)))UUUMMMBBB999|PP3f333f3333f3ffffff3f̙3ff333f333333333f33333333f33f3ff3f3f3f3333f33̙33333f333333f3333f3ffffff3f33ff3f3f3f3fff3ffffffffff3ffff̙fff3fffff3fff333f3f3ff3ff33f̙̙3̙ff̙̙̙3f̙3f333f3333f3ffffff3f̙3f3f3f333f3333f3ffffff3f̙3f3ffffffffff!___www4'A x(xKʦ """)))UUUMMMBBB999|PP3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙f3333f3333333333f3333333f3f33ff3f3f3f3333f3333333f3̙33333f333ff3ffffff3f33f3ff3f3f3ffff3fffffffff3fffffff3f̙ffff3ff333f3ff33fff33f3ff̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff̙̙3̙f̙̙̙3f̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3ffffffffff!___wwwݼݼݼݼýݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݼݼ¼ݽݼݼݽݼݼݼݽüݼݽݼݼݼݼ޼ݼݼݼݼ⽼ݼݼݼݽݼݼݽݼݶݼ޼ܼ¼ýݻݼܼݼݼݼݼݼݽݼ޼ݼ׵ݼݶ⼶ݵݼ⼼ⵍϮ޼ݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݵ׻ݼݼݵ⼯޼ύ޼޼ݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ׼ݒݼܯϑ׵ݼ׻ݼݼݼݼݼݼݽ¼ݼݒϻݼܶό׶ݼݼݼݼݽ¼⼻⼼޼ݼ޽޼ݶݽ׶׵ݼݼݼݼ޼½޻ݵݶ¼ݼϯݼݵϴݼݼ׼ݼݼݼ޼ݼݽݼ׼׵׼ݼג⼼׻Ϯ϶ݼݶܵܶݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ޼ϯݶϒݼݼ׼ݼݽݼݼݼݼ޽ݼݼ޼ݽϵܼݼݼݼݼݼ¼ݽ¼ݽûݼּݼ׵ݼݶּϒύϒü޼ݼݼݼݽݼݼݽ½ⶵݼݼ׼ݶܻݼϮύϒύݼݵ⽼ݼݼݼݼݼݽݼ޵׶ݼݻ׶ݍϮϮύύϮϵ޼ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽ޼ݼ׼ݼݼݼݶݼݼݼݼ⽼ݼ⼼ݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼ޽ݼݼ޼ݼ½ݽ޼ݼݼݼ޼ݼݼ޽ݼݼݼ޼ݽ޽ݼݼݼݼݼ޼ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ޽ݼݼݼüü޼ݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݽݼ޼ݼ½ݽݽݼ¼ݼݽݼݼݼü޼ݼݼݼݼ¼¼ݼݽ½ݼݽݼݼݼݼ¼ݼݼݼݼݼ½ݼݼݼ޼ݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݼݼ޼޼ݽݼݼݼݼݼݼ޽ݼݼݼݼݽ޼޽ݼݼݼݽݼݽݼ½ݽݼݼݼ_____________________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݵ______________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼ_______________________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݵ_______________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼ________________________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݵ____________________________________________________________________________ݼݽݼݼ_________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼ__________________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼ_______________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݵ_______________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݵ___________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݽݼݼݼݵ________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݵ______________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ________________________________________________________________________ݼݽݼݼݼ______________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݵ__________________________________________________ݼݼݼݽݼݼݵ_____________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ_________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ______________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݵ_________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼ޼ݼݼݼ___________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݵ________________________________________________________________________________ݼüݼݼݼݼݵ___________________________________________________________________ݽݼݼݼݼݼݵ__________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݽݼݼݼ________________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼ_________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼݵ_________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼ__________________________________________________ݽݼݼݼݼݼ__________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼ______________________________________________ݼݼݼ޼ݼݼݼݵ_______________________________________________________________ݽ⼽ݼݼݼݼݼݵ__________________________________________________________________ݼݽݼݼݼݼ_________________________________________________________________ݼݽݼ¼޼ݼݼݼݵ____________________________________________________________ݼݼݼ⽼ݼݼݼݵ_______________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼ޼ݼݼݼݼݼ________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼ޼ݼ޼޼ݼݼݼݵ________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼ޼½ݼݼݼݼ____________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼݼ¼ݼݼݼݼ_____________________________________________________________________ݼݽݼݼݼ޼ݼݼݼݼݵ____________________________________________________ݼݼݽݼݼ޼ݼݼݼ____________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼ޼ݽݼݼݼݵ___________________________________________________________________ݼݼݼݼݼ¼޽ݼݼݼݼ____________________________________________________ݽݼ޼ݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݼý޼ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽ޼ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ¼ݽ⼼ݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݽüݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݼ޼⼼ݼݼݼݼݼݼ⽼ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽݼ⼼ݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݼݽ¼ݼݼݼݼ޼½ݼݼ޼ݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݼ¼ݽ¼ݽݼݼݼݽݼݼݽ½ݼݼݼݼݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼݽ޼ݼݼݼݼ⽼ݼ⼼ݼݽݼݼݼݼݼݼ޽ݼݼ޼ݼ½ݽ޼ݼݼݼ޼ݼݼ޽ݼݼݼ޼ݽ޽ݼݼݼݼݼ޼ݼݼݼݼݼ՜.+,D՜.+,    KOn-screen ShowMTA,hA ArialTimes New Roman Wingdings Arial BlackTahomacmsy10SymbolPixel4Strict Polynomial-Time in Simulation and ExtractionInteractive Proofs/ArgumentsInteractive Proofs/ArgumentsDefinition of Zero-Knowledge:)Definition of Proofs of Knowledge (POK):Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 97Impossibility of strict poly-time black-box simulation Slide 11 Slide 12 Slide 13 Slide 14 Slide 15 Slide 16 Slide 17 Slide 18 Slide 19 Slide 20 Slide 21 Slide 22  Fonts UsedDesign Template Slide TitlesD 4<Version"_X Boaz BarakBoaz Barak  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root EntrydO)PicturesCurrent UserSummaryInformation(0UPowerPoint Document(,XDocumentSummaryInformation8